USS Obama Departs For Japan With Humanitarian Aid

The USS Obama departed from the Port of Mombasa, in Barack Obama's home country of Kenya.,  fully laden with ten cases of Newport cigarettes, 11 basketballs, fourteen golf fairway woods, and seven refurbished iPods filled with Obama speeches.

Eyewitness T.J. reports; "The USS Obama attempted to leave 5 times, but due to the tidal surge they keep coming back to port. The cigarettes are nearly gone."

After four days, and finally out to sea, the mighty dugout was last seen seven miles off the coast of Kenya. The USS Obama is expected to arrive in Japan in about four months. 

Upon its arrival to the stricken Japanese homeland, its cargo of humanitarian aid will be distributed to the Japanese people.

The USS Obama departed from the Port of Mombasa, in Barack Obama's home country of Kenya.,  fully laden with ten cases of Newport cigarettes, 11 basketballs, fourteen golf fairway woods, and seven refurbished iPods filled with Obama speeches.

Eyewitness T.J. reports; "The USS Obama attempted to leave 5 times, but due to the tidal surge they keep coming back to port. The cigarettes are nearly gone."

After four days, and finally out to sea, the mighty dugout was last seen seven miles off the coast of Kenya. The USS Obama is expected to arrive in Japan in about four months. 

Upon its arrival to the stricken Japanese homeland, its cargo of humanitarian aid will be distributed to the Japanese people.

Do You Know What This Is?

This statue currently stands outside the Iraqi palace, now home to the 4th Infantry division. It will eventually be shipped home and put in the memorial museum in Fort Hood, Texas

The statue was created by an Iraqi artist named Kalat, who for years was forced by Saddam Hussein to make the many hundreds of bronze busts of Saddam that dotted Baghdad. Kalat was so grateful for the America's liberation of his country; he melted 3 of the heads of the fallen Saddam statues and made this statue as a memorial to the American soldiers and their fallen warriors .
Kalat worked on this memorial night and day for several months.

To the left of the kneeling soldier is a small Iraqi girl giving the soldier comfort as he mourns the loss of his comrade in arms.

Do you know why we don't hear about this in the news? The media avoids it because it does not have the shock effect.

To me, it is news that must be passed on.

This statue currently stands outside the Iraqi palace, now home to the 4th Infantry division. It will eventually be shipped home and put in the memorial museum in Fort Hood, Texas

The statue was created by an Iraqi artist named Kalat, who for years was forced by Saddam Hussein to make the many hundreds of bronze busts of Saddam that dotted Baghdad. Kalat was so grateful for the America's liberation of his country; he melted 3 of the heads of the fallen Saddam statues and made this statue as a memorial to the American soldiers and their fallen warriors .
Kalat worked on this memorial night and day for several months.

To the left of the kneeling soldier is a small Iraqi girl giving the soldier comfort as he mourns the loss of his comrade in arms.

Do you know why we don't hear about this in the news? The media avoids it because it does not have the shock effect.

To me, it is news that must be passed on.

The Benson-Reagan Letter Story

(Note: This previously ran at badgerbenson.com)

The Reagan Centennial Celebration

A Super Sunday…

It’s Super Bowl Sunday! A big party day across the country. As a Chiefs fan I usually cheer on the AFC teams, so I’ll probably back the Steelers this year.

Today is also a very special day for another reason. I’m sure you’ve heard the past few days about the celebration of Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday. Sarah Palin and Dick Cheney were two of the speakers for the festivities this weekend. President Reagan touched everyone. He is now one of the most admired presidents we’ve had.

1st Inductee into Badger’s AmeriCAN Hall of Fame:

He was a transformational leader with charm and grace. He had amazing wit and humor. His humble beginnings in Illinois to his time at WHO radio in Des Moines, his days in Hollywood, the "time for choosing" speech, challenging Republican leadership, turning around the nation’s economy, comforting our nation during disaster, ending the Cold War, and his last days on his loved ranch…He lived a great American life! He’s exactly what I look for each month when I put together the AmeriCANS/CANTS for each month. For those reasons he is the first inductee into my AmeriCANS Hall of Fame. You might recall that recently I announced the winners for the AmeriCANS/CANTS of 2010. The new Hall of Fame will be for historical figures, with selections done three times each year – Reagan’s birthday, Independence Day, and New Years Eve. I’ll have more about that on the show this week.

The Benson-Reagan Letter Story

I also wanted to pass along a personal story I have with President Reagan. In 1980 Reagan made a stop at the Marshall County Courthouse (Marshalltown, Iowa) during the presidential campaign. At the stop a two year old boy was placed on his lap for a photo-opt. That kid was me! My parents also invited Reagan to speak at the family farm.

Unfortunately the photo did not turn out. And unfortunately Reagan was unable to speak at the farm. However, he did receive word of the botched photo and sent my parents a nice letter along with an autographed picture addressed to me. Today both items sit in frames in my office. Everything that I am doing today can be traced back to the inspiration that I take from that letter and the knowledge of one of our most important leaders taking the time to address an Iowa farm family. Reagan’s historical accomplishments stand on their own. But it was the simple acts like the letter to Rod and Sherry Benson that made this man so loved by his countrymen.

Last spring I put together a promotional video when I started my show. It contains a reading of the letter done by our family friend, Postmaster Bob Nusbaum from State Center, Iowa. The Reagan Letter video. You can hear the show featuring the Reagan Letter story here.

Also here is the scanned copy of the letter. I was fortunate about 10 years ago to meet Michael Reagan at the Iowa State Fair and he signed the newspaper article about the young Benson and his father back in 1980.

(Note: This previously ran at badgerbenson.com)

The Reagan Centennial Celebration

A Super Sunday…

It’s Super Bowl Sunday! A big party day across the country. As a Chiefs fan I usually cheer on the AFC teams, so I’ll probably back the Steelers this year.

Today is also a very special day for another reason. I’m sure you’ve heard the past few days about the celebration of Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday. Sarah Palin and Dick Cheney were two of the speakers for the festivities this weekend. President Reagan touched everyone. He is now one of the most admired presidents we’ve had.

1st Inductee into Badger’s AmeriCAN Hall of Fame:

He was a transformational leader with charm and grace. He had amazing wit and humor. His humble beginnings in Illinois to his time at WHO radio in Des Moines, his days in Hollywood, the "time for choosing" speech, challenging Republican leadership, turning around the nation’s economy, comforting our nation during disaster, ending the Cold War, and his last days on his loved ranch…He lived a great American life! He’s exactly what I look for each month when I put together the AmeriCANS/CANTS for each month. For those reasons he is the first inductee into my AmeriCANS Hall of Fame. You might recall that recently I announced the winners for the AmeriCANS/CANTS of 2010. The new Hall of Fame will be for historical figures, with selections done three times each year – Reagan’s birthday, Independence Day, and New Years Eve. I’ll have more about that on the show this week.

The Benson-Reagan Letter Story

I also wanted to pass along a personal story I have with President Reagan. In 1980 Reagan made a stop at the Marshall County Courthouse (Marshalltown, Iowa) during the presidential campaign. At the stop a two year old boy was placed on his lap for a photo-opt. That kid was me! My parents also invited Reagan to speak at the family farm.

Unfortunately the photo did not turn out. And unfortunately Reagan was unable to speak at the farm. However, he did receive word of the botched photo and sent my parents a nice letter along with an autographed picture addressed to me. Today both items sit in frames in my office. Everything that I am doing today can be traced back to the inspiration that I take from that letter and the knowledge of one of our most important leaders taking the time to address an Iowa farm family. Reagan’s historical accomplishments stand on their own. But it was the simple acts like the letter to Rod and Sherry Benson that made this man so loved by his countrymen.

Last spring I put together a promotional video when I started my show. It contains a reading of the letter done by our family friend, Postmaster Bob Nusbaum from State Center, Iowa. The Reagan Letter video. You can hear the show featuring the Reagan Letter story here.

Also here is the scanned copy of the letter. I was fortunate about 10 years ago to meet Michael Reagan at the Iowa State Fair and he signed the newspaper article about the young Benson and his father back in 1980.

The Global Warming Bubble Begins to Burst.

While surfing the web last week I came across an article titled "Oh my! Greenpeace founder is an anthropogenic global warming denier". My curiosity piqued I clicked on the image under the title, as there was no accompanying text, and was directed to a page on the Amazon.com site featuring a book written by Dr. Patrick Moore titled "Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist"

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Dr. Moore, he has been a leader in the international environmental field for over 30 years. He is one of the co founders of Greenpeace and has served for nine years as President of Greenpeace Canada and seven years as a Director of Greenpeace International. As the leader of many campaigns Dr. Moore was a driving force shaping policy and direction while Greenpeace became the world's largest environmental activist organization.


As described on the Amazon site

Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist is Dr. Patrick Moore's engaging firsthand account of his many years spent as the ultimate Greenpeace insider, a co-founder and leader in the organization's top committee. Moore explains why, 15 years after co-founding it, he left Greenpeace to establish a more sensible, science-based approach to environmentalism. From energy independence to climate change, genetic engineering to aquaculture, Moore sheds new light on some of the most controversial subjects in the news today.


A proponent of nuclear energy Dr Moore has spent the last several weeks promoting his book and making appearances on the various cable station news shows most notably Stuart Varney where he unequivocally stated:

"We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the global warming that has occurred in the last 200 years...The alarmism is driving us through scare tactics to adopt energy policies that are going to create a huge amount of energy poverty among the poor people. It's not good for people and its not good for the environment...In a warmer world we can produce more food."

"A powerful convergent of interests. Scientists seeking grant money, media seeking headlines, universities seeking huge grants from major institutions, foundations, environmental groups, politicians wanting to make it look like they are saving future generations. And all of these people have converged on this issue"

Another defection. Another dropout. Another soon to be vilified and excommunicated member of the Church of Global Warming. This, however, is no normal heretic. This is akin to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John recanting the scriptures that bear their names. Just kidding. No harm, no foul. We didn't mean for you to take it so seriously.

This is just the latest setback to befall the Global Warming believers. In February of 2010 the prestigious Institute of Physics in their memorandum to Parliament admonished the CRU for many of the methods and methodologies in their research concerning Global Warming.

Among their findings

The Institute is concerned that, unless the disclosed e-mails are proved to be forgeries or adaptations, worrying implications arise for the integrity of scientific research in this field and for the credibility of the scientific method as practised in this context.

The CRU e-mails as published on the internet provide prima facie evidence of determined and co-ordinated refusals to comply with honourable scientific traditions and freedom of information law. The principle that scientists should be willing to expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by others, which requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials, is vital. The lack of compliance has been confirmed by the findings of the Information Commissioner. This extends well beyond the CRU itself - most of the e-mails were exchanged with researchers in a number of other international institutions who are also involved in the formulation of the IPCC's conclusions on climate change.

There is also reason for concern at the intolerance to challenge displayed in the e-mails. This impedes the process of scientific 'self correction', which is vital to the integrity of the scientific process as a whole, and not just to the research itself. In that context, those CRU e-mails relating to the peer-review process suggest a need for a review of its adequacy and objectivity as practised in this field and its potential vulnerability to bias or manipulation.

Rather damning criticism from an organization whose mission statement is described as

The Institute of Physics is a scientific charity devoted to increasing the practice, understanding and application of physics.

It has a worldwide membership of around 40 000 and is a leading communicator of physics-related science to all audiences, from specialists through to government and the general public. Its publishing company, IOP Publishing, is a world leader in scientific publishing and the electronic dissemination of physics.

As President Obama, the Democrats, and the eco-facists continue their assault on fossil fuels and American energy independence, more and more scientists are expressing their concerns over global warming. In October of 2010 Professor Emeritus of physics Hal Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara resigned from the world's second largest organization of physicists The American Physical Society. In a tersely worded letter to the President of the society Professor Davis stated the following

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago)..........How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society. It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudo scientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.

As many of us have long suspected the Global Warming scam has always been about money jobs, and power. Those who were able to manipulate the media and have their voices be heard over those who held dissenting views were the ones who received the funding and science be damned. The squeaky wheel always gets the grease. With the passing of each day more and more scientists begin to express their reservations over man made anthropogenic global warming.

For further reading.

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/01/brrr-analysts-predict-freezing-winters-in-europe-will-be-the-norm-for-20-40-years/

http://notrickszone.com/2010/10/14/winters-comparable-with-the-harsh-1939-42-winters-october-13-2010-snow-to-blanket-parts-of-europe/

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECIAL-REPORT-More-Than-1000-International-Scientists-Dissent-Over-ManMade-Global-Warming-Claims--Challenge-UN-IPCC--Gore

http://www.akdart.com/warming4.html

While surfing the web last week I came across an article titled "Oh my! Greenpeace founder is an anthropogenic global warming denier". My curiosity piqued I clicked on the image under the title, as there was no accompanying text, and was directed to a page on the Amazon.com site featuring a book written by Dr. Patrick Moore titled "Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist"

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Dr. Moore, he has been a leader in the international environmental field for over 30 years. He is one of the co founders of Greenpeace and has served for nine years as President of Greenpeace Canada and seven years as a Director of Greenpeace International. As the leader of many campaigns Dr. Moore was a driving force shaping policy and direction while Greenpeace became the world's largest environmental activist organization.


As described on the Amazon site

Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist is Dr. Patrick Moore's engaging firsthand account of his many years spent as the ultimate Greenpeace insider, a co-founder and leader in the organization's top committee. Moore explains why, 15 years after co-founding it, he left Greenpeace to establish a more sensible, science-based approach to environmentalism. From energy independence to climate change, genetic engineering to aquaculture, Moore sheds new light on some of the most controversial subjects in the news today.


A proponent of nuclear energy Dr Moore has spent the last several weeks promoting his book and making appearances on the various cable station news shows most notably Stuart Varney where he unequivocally stated:

"We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the global warming that has occurred in the last 200 years...The alarmism is driving us through scare tactics to adopt energy policies that are going to create a huge amount of energy poverty among the poor people. It's not good for people and its not good for the environment...In a warmer world we can produce more food."

"A powerful convergent of interests. Scientists seeking grant money, media seeking headlines, universities seeking huge grants from major institutions, foundations, environmental groups, politicians wanting to make it look like they are saving future generations. And all of these people have converged on this issue"

Another defection. Another dropout. Another soon to be vilified and excommunicated member of the Church of Global Warming. This, however, is no normal heretic. This is akin to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John recanting the scriptures that bear their names. Just kidding. No harm, no foul. We didn't mean for you to take it so seriously.

This is just the latest setback to befall the Global Warming believers. In February of 2010 the prestigious Institute of Physics in their memorandum to Parliament admonished the CRU for many of the methods and methodologies in their research concerning Global Warming.

Among their findings

The Institute is concerned that, unless the disclosed e-mails are proved to be forgeries or adaptations, worrying implications arise for the integrity of scientific research in this field and for the credibility of the scientific method as practised in this context.

The CRU e-mails as published on the internet provide prima facie evidence of determined and co-ordinated refusals to comply with honourable scientific traditions and freedom of information law. The principle that scientists should be willing to expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by others, which requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials, is vital. The lack of compliance has been confirmed by the findings of the Information Commissioner. This extends well beyond the CRU itself - most of the e-mails were exchanged with researchers in a number of other international institutions who are also involved in the formulation of the IPCC's conclusions on climate change.

There is also reason for concern at the intolerance to challenge displayed in the e-mails. This impedes the process of scientific 'self correction', which is vital to the integrity of the scientific process as a whole, and not just to the research itself. In that context, those CRU e-mails relating to the peer-review process suggest a need for a review of its adequacy and objectivity as practised in this field and its potential vulnerability to bias or manipulation.

Rather damning criticism from an organization whose mission statement is described as

The Institute of Physics is a scientific charity devoted to increasing the practice, understanding and application of physics.

It has a worldwide membership of around 40 000 and is a leading communicator of physics-related science to all audiences, from specialists through to government and the general public. Its publishing company, IOP Publishing, is a world leader in scientific publishing and the electronic dissemination of physics.

As President Obama, the Democrats, and the eco-facists continue their assault on fossil fuels and American energy independence, more and more scientists are expressing their concerns over global warming. In October of 2010 Professor Emeritus of physics Hal Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara resigned from the world's second largest organization of physicists The American Physical Society. In a tersely worded letter to the President of the society Professor Davis stated the following

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago)..........How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society. It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudo scientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.

As many of us have long suspected the Global Warming scam has always been about money jobs, and power. Those who were able to manipulate the media and have their voices be heard over those who held dissenting views were the ones who received the funding and science be damned. The squeaky wheel always gets the grease. With the passing of each day more and more scientists begin to express their reservations over man made anthropogenic global warming.

For further reading.

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/01/brrr-analysts-predict-freezing-winters-in-europe-will-be-the-norm-for-20-40-years/

http://notrickszone.com/2010/10/14/winters-comparable-with-the-harsh-1939-42-winters-october-13-2010-snow-to-blanket-parts-of-europe/

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECIAL-REPORT-More-Than-1000-International-Scientists-Dissent-Over-ManMade-Global-Warming-Claims--Challenge-UN-IPCC--Gore

http://www.akdart.com/warming4.html

The Innate Peacefulness of Progressives & Liberals

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” -Barack Obama, June 13, 2008, Philadelphia fundraiser.

I see no problem with what was said by Barack Obama. It's well known that this is simply harmful, political rhetoric when it comes from a Democrat politician playing the politics of fear.

Everyone knows that Liberals and Progressives don't really mean anyone any physical harm... 'cept Jared Loughner. But, we're not talking about him now.

As I was saying, liberals aren't violent. They would rather smoke dope, have free sex and sing Kumbaya...'cept Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dorhn. But, we're not talking about them at this time.

Liberals and Progressives just want to love everyone up... 'cept Van Jones... He’s called for violent revolution. But, that would be seen only as vitriol and hate speech, if it came from someone on the right. But it didn’t come from the right, it came from Van Jones. He’s a Progressive.  Jones REALLY didn't mean that, did he? Jones gets a pass!

Liberals and Progressives are a lovable lot, devoid of any hatred, and incapable of hate speech... ‘cept for Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Everyone knows his kind of black liberation theology is harmless, non-incendiary, and isn’t violent. Not really...

Liberals and Progressives AREN'T violent. 'cept for Andy Stern, a crony of Obama. He allowed his SEIU thugs to beat up an African-American conservative. But that wasn't really violent. Not REALLY...

As I was saying, Liberals and Progressives NEVER call for violence. Not really... 'cept Bill Maher, who "joked" about Sarah Palin being the first of the useless people to be killed. That’s not really violent. No siree!

As I have been pointing out, Liberals and Progressives are incapable of violence, or hate speech. 'cept maybe Ed Schultz, who on MSNBC has stated several times that Conservatives need to be killed. But, that was just Ed exercising his right to free speech. Not really a call for violence. Not really.

As I was saying, in defense of Liberals and Progressives, they just don’t have a violent bone in their collective bodies. They NEVER engage in hate speech, 'cept maybe the SEIU thugs who assaulted black Conservative and a senior citizen Tea Party member. But, that wasn't REALLY violence. Uh-uh, Nope!

Liberals and Progressives NEVER call for harm against conservatives. 'cept maybe Randi Rhodes, who recommended as a "joke" during her Air America (Liberal talk) radio show, that G.W. Bush should be assassinated. It was just a harmless joke though. Rhodes wasn't serious.... Not really. She's a LIBERAL! Rhodes only said that, jokingly; tongue n’ cheek,  "Like Fredo, somebody ought to take him out fishing and pow!" NOT VIOLENT! NOT HATE SPEECH! The funny part of the whole thing is when Rhodes imitated that sound of the gunshot. But, there was no harm done. Not REALLY. It was FUNNY though… Wasn’t it?

As I have been insisting... Liberals and Progressives only want to make love, not violence. 'cept maybe the criminals that destroyed and vandalized a large glass door with a chunk of cinder block at the Republican Party headquarters, in downtown Flagstaff. But, we must remember, it wasn't THAT violent, or hateful.

Nope! No violence or hate from the left. NEVER!

‘cept maybe the marching ‘Brownshirts (Oct, 2004) for Kerry’. Or, maybe the Leftist who spit (Oct, 2004) on Major Jerry Boyle, USMC, an Iraq War Vet, and candidate for Congress. They were just marching and spitting with peaceful intentions. But, they weren’t being violent.

There is NO violence from the left. It just doesn't happen. 'cept for one Joe Stack, who flew his plane into a Federal Building in Austin, TX. He was just peacefully expressing himself. It wasn't all that violent.

Folks, I cannot stress it enough. The Liberals and Progressives are not into violence. PERIOD!

Well… 'cept maybe for Clay Duke, who waltzed into a Florida school board meeting, armed with a handgun. Clay spray-painted a left-wing "V for Vendetta" symbol on the wall. Then peaceful Clay attempted to gun down the school board members. Eventually Clay inflicted peace upon himself. He shot himself. Good thing the peaceful Progressives and Liberals didn’t try to blame Clay’s actions on the right. That would never cross a Progressive’s or Liberal’s mind. They’re all peaceful and ethical!

Ethical? Remember Pelosi’s promise to drain the swamp? But, I digress…

Face it folks... There are no violent Liberals, no violent Progressives out there! Just as there are no racist African-Americans, there are no violent Liberals, or Progressives. It's a scientific fact! It’s  'scientifical', and etched into stone, as are all the transitional fossils in the evolutionary fossil record! 'cept for maybe Norman Leboon.

 Laboon was registered as a Democrat, and had been a donor to Obama’s campaign. Leboon shot into Eric Cantor’s Virginia office. Leboon is also responsible for the peaceful, touchy-feelyYoutube video manifesto:  

"My Congressman Eric Cantor, and you and your cupcake evil wife. Remember Eric, our judgment time, the final Yom Kippur has been given. You are a liar, you’re a Lucifer, you’re a pig, a greedy f*cking pig, you’re an abomination, you receive my bullets in your office, remember they will be placed in your heads. You and your children are Lucifer’s abominations."

But, that's hardly violence from the left. Not really. Leboon was just having some harmless fun.

Again, I cannot stress any more than this; Liberals and Progressives are NOT violent. 'cept maybe for the anonymous, peaceful liberal who called Congresswoman Jean Schmitt, then left the following voicemail:

"Yeah, I'm glad the president passed health care. Yeah. Funky ass, racist-ass Republicans hate that, don't you? Jean Schmitt, when you got hit by that car, you should've broke your back, b*tch. And Boehner, motherf****r that Mitch McConnell. All you racist f**king Republicans. Why don't you just change your party name to racist? Cuz if one of those f**king Tea baggers had spit on me, I'd have shot all them in the f**king face with my f**king 9 millimeter. F**k all you racist motherf****rs.

Laboon and the anonymous liberal caller are shining examples of how peaceful Progressives and Liberals truly can be!

It is amazing how peace loving Progressives and Liberals actually are… ‘cept for maybe a member at the social news site, Old Dogg. His handle is Novenator; He also goes by Novae elsewhere on the web. Novenator regularly uses multiple handles at the dig social news site. That way he can get maximum effect for his loving and peaceful, Progressive rants. Novenator’s legions of peaceful Liberal, and Progressive fans who follow him on his Twitter account, know him best under his nom de plume, Ole Ole Olson.

In Early August, 2010, Novenator posted following peaceful rant at Old Dogg: We need a little Che action in America right now. The yolk of corporate tyranny has taken over, the brownshirt fascists on the right who wrap themselves in the flag and carry a cross are only too happy to whore themselves out to this beast.

Armed revolution FTW!

The rabid Novenator types, are just more examples that Progressives and Liberals do not always practice what they preach, when they speak of peace and tolerance.

 What we have learned from these examples of tolerance shown by the Progressives, and Liberals who occupy the fringe, is that the caustic vitriol and poisonous rhetoric does not originate from the mainstream,  Conservative side of the political aisle. Both sides are responsible for what is said. Only, the fact of the matter is, while both sides of the aisle should be working together to repair problems that are sinking this listing nation, it is the pundits on the left, supported and encouraged by a biased, left leaning media, who are getting all the traction in demonizing the right for the heinous crimes that Jared Loughner committed.

The left took a map posted by Sarah Palin on her Facebook page, and blamed if for encouraging Jared Louhgner to gun down an Arizona Congresswoman and dozens of her supporters. The left took the message of Palin’s map and spun it out of context, in order to politicize the murders committed by Louhgner. Palin’s map was intended to target political seats for the 2010 elections, in a grass roots effort to get certain public servants voted out of office. Clearly, it was not Palin’s objective to get anyone killed, or to put a literal gun-sight on a candidate’s back as some subliminal message that the target should be shot.

If Sarah Palin is guilty of the above allegations, and if we as a public are gullible and stupid enough to believe the spin the left is engaging in, then we as a nation have no hope to survive.

If Sarah Palin is guilty of calling for the assassination of political figures through the use of a simple drawn and simply understood graphic, then those leveling such charges against Sarah Palin and the Tea Party are guilty of the same, when they posted their own graphic targeting Conservatives.

One of Several ‘bull’s-eye’ and ‘Target’ maps created by the left.

The map shown above comes from the blog Verum Serum, who has done an outstanding job in displaying the several ‘bull’s-eye’ and ‘Target’ maps created by the left. I invite you to visit Verum Serum to fully appreciate the hypocrisy from the left who point their corked fingers at Sarah Palin’s ‘Target’ map.

It is time that the American people see through the spin, the lies and the chicanery perpetrated upon them by the Liberals and Progressives for political points and political gain. The left is not the solution, nor does it know the solution to all this nation’s ills, when it is the left that politicizes those ills for their own political gain. 

The left has no solution. The left creates the problem.

As a nation, we should demand better from those on the left, and we should also hold the right to a higher and a better standard than what we expect from the left. For the right to achieve such standards would be a standard the left is incapable of ever achieving.

I dedicate this article to all the peaceful Progressives and Liberals out there. You guys need to really wake up.

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” -Barack Obama, June 13, 2008, Philadelphia fundraiser.

I see no problem with what was said by Barack Obama. It's well known that this is simply harmful, political rhetoric when it comes from a Democrat politician playing the politics of fear.

Everyone knows that Liberals and Progressives don't really mean anyone any physical harm... 'cept Jared Loughner. But, we're not talking about him now.

As I was saying, liberals aren't violent. They would rather smoke dope, have free sex and sing Kumbaya...'cept Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dorhn. But, we're not talking about them at this time.

Liberals and Progressives just want to love everyone up... 'cept Van Jones... He’s called for violent revolution. But, that would be seen only as vitriol and hate speech, if it came from someone on the right. But it didn’t come from the right, it came from Van Jones. He’s a Progressive.  Jones REALLY didn't mean that, did he? Jones gets a pass!

Liberals and Progressives are a lovable lot, devoid of any hatred, and incapable of hate speech... ‘cept for Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Everyone knows his kind of black liberation theology is harmless, non-incendiary, and isn’t violent. Not really...

Liberals and Progressives AREN'T violent. 'cept for Andy Stern, a crony of Obama. He allowed his SEIU thugs to beat up an African-American conservative. But that wasn't really violent. Not REALLY...

As I was saying, Liberals and Progressives NEVER call for violence. Not really... 'cept Bill Maher, who "joked" about Sarah Palin being the first of the useless people to be killed. That’s not really violent. No siree!

As I have been pointing out, Liberals and Progressives are incapable of violence, or hate speech. 'cept maybe Ed Schultz, who on MSNBC has stated several times that Conservatives need to be killed. But, that was just Ed exercising his right to free speech. Not really a call for violence. Not really.

As I was saying, in defense of Liberals and Progressives, they just don’t have a violent bone in their collective bodies. They NEVER engage in hate speech, 'cept maybe the SEIU thugs who assaulted black Conservative and a senior citizen Tea Party member. But, that wasn't REALLY violence. Uh-uh, Nope!

Liberals and Progressives NEVER call for harm against conservatives. 'cept maybe Randi Rhodes, who recommended as a "joke" during her Air America (Liberal talk) radio show, that G.W. Bush should be assassinated. It was just a harmless joke though. Rhodes wasn't serious.... Not really. She's a LIBERAL! Rhodes only said that, jokingly; tongue n’ cheek,  "Like Fredo, somebody ought to take him out fishing and pow!" NOT VIOLENT! NOT HATE SPEECH! The funny part of the whole thing is when Rhodes imitated that sound of the gunshot. But, there was no harm done. Not REALLY. It was FUNNY though… Wasn’t it?

As I have been insisting... Liberals and Progressives only want to make love, not violence. 'cept maybe the criminals that destroyed and vandalized a large glass door with a chunk of cinder block at the Republican Party headquarters, in downtown Flagstaff. But, we must remember, it wasn't THAT violent, or hateful.

Nope! No violence or hate from the left. NEVER!

‘cept maybe the marching ‘Brownshirts (Oct, 2004) for Kerry’. Or, maybe the Leftist who spit (Oct, 2004) on Major Jerry Boyle, USMC, an Iraq War Vet, and candidate for Congress. They were just marching and spitting with peaceful intentions. But, they weren’t being violent.

There is NO violence from the left. It just doesn't happen. 'cept for one Joe Stack, who flew his plane into a Federal Building in Austin, TX. He was just peacefully expressing himself. It wasn't all that violent.

Folks, I cannot stress it enough. The Liberals and Progressives are not into violence. PERIOD!

Well… 'cept maybe for Clay Duke, who waltzed into a Florida school board meeting, armed with a handgun. Clay spray-painted a left-wing "V for Vendetta" symbol on the wall. Then peaceful Clay attempted to gun down the school board members. Eventually Clay inflicted peace upon himself. He shot himself. Good thing the peaceful Progressives and Liberals didn’t try to blame Clay’s actions on the right. That would never cross a Progressive’s or Liberal’s mind. They’re all peaceful and ethical!

Ethical? Remember Pelosi’s promise to drain the swamp? But, I digress…

Face it folks... There are no violent Liberals, no violent Progressives out there! Just as there are no racist African-Americans, there are no violent Liberals, or Progressives. It's a scientific fact! It’s  'scientifical', and etched into stone, as are all the transitional fossils in the evolutionary fossil record! 'cept for maybe Norman Leboon.

 Laboon was registered as a Democrat, and had been a donor to Obama’s campaign. Leboon shot into Eric Cantor’s Virginia office. Leboon is also responsible for the peaceful, touchy-feelyYoutube video manifesto:  

"My Congressman Eric Cantor, and you and your cupcake evil wife. Remember Eric, our judgment time, the final Yom Kippur has been given. You are a liar, you’re a Lucifer, you’re a pig, a greedy f*cking pig, you’re an abomination, you receive my bullets in your office, remember they will be placed in your heads. You and your children are Lucifer’s abominations."

But, that's hardly violence from the left. Not really. Leboon was just having some harmless fun.

Again, I cannot stress any more than this; Liberals and Progressives are NOT violent. 'cept maybe for the anonymous, peaceful liberal who called Congresswoman Jean Schmitt, then left the following voicemail:

"Yeah, I'm glad the president passed health care. Yeah. Funky ass, racist-ass Republicans hate that, don't you? Jean Schmitt, when you got hit by that car, you should've broke your back, b*tch. And Boehner, motherf****r that Mitch McConnell. All you racist f**king Republicans. Why don't you just change your party name to racist? Cuz if one of those f**king Tea baggers had spit on me, I'd have shot all them in the f**king face with my f**king 9 millimeter. F**k all you racist motherf****rs.

Laboon and the anonymous liberal caller are shining examples of how peaceful Progressives and Liberals truly can be!

It is amazing how peace loving Progressives and Liberals actually are… ‘cept for maybe a member at the social news site, Old Dogg. His handle is Novenator; He also goes by Novae elsewhere on the web. Novenator regularly uses multiple handles at the dig social news site. That way he can get maximum effect for his loving and peaceful, Progressive rants. Novenator’s legions of peaceful Liberal, and Progressive fans who follow him on his Twitter account, know him best under his nom de plume, Ole Ole Olson.

In Early August, 2010, Novenator posted following peaceful rant at Old Dogg: We need a little Che action in America right now. The yolk of corporate tyranny has taken over, the brownshirt fascists on the right who wrap themselves in the flag and carry a cross are only too happy to whore themselves out to this beast.

Armed revolution FTW!

The rabid Novenator types, are just more examples that Progressives and Liberals do not always practice what they preach, when they speak of peace and tolerance.

 What we have learned from these examples of tolerance shown by the Progressives, and Liberals who occupy the fringe, is that the caustic vitriol and poisonous rhetoric does not originate from the mainstream,  Conservative side of the political aisle. Both sides are responsible for what is said. Only, the fact of the matter is, while both sides of the aisle should be working together to repair problems that are sinking this listing nation, it is the pundits on the left, supported and encouraged by a biased, left leaning media, who are getting all the traction in demonizing the right for the heinous crimes that Jared Loughner committed.

The left took a map posted by Sarah Palin on her Facebook page, and blamed if for encouraging Jared Louhgner to gun down an Arizona Congresswoman and dozens of her supporters. The left took the message of Palin’s map and spun it out of context, in order to politicize the murders committed by Louhgner. Palin’s map was intended to target political seats for the 2010 elections, in a grass roots effort to get certain public servants voted out of office. Clearly, it was not Palin’s objective to get anyone killed, or to put a literal gun-sight on a candidate’s back as some subliminal message that the target should be shot.

If Sarah Palin is guilty of the above allegations, and if we as a public are gullible and stupid enough to believe the spin the left is engaging in, then we as a nation have no hope to survive.

If Sarah Palin is guilty of calling for the assassination of political figures through the use of a simple drawn and simply understood graphic, then those leveling such charges against Sarah Palin and the Tea Party are guilty of the same, when they posted their own graphic targeting Conservatives.

One of Several ‘bull’s-eye’ and ‘Target’ maps created by the left.

The map shown above comes from the blog Verum Serum, who has done an outstanding job in displaying the several ‘bull’s-eye’ and ‘Target’ maps created by the left. I invite you to visit Verum Serum to fully appreciate the hypocrisy from the left who point their corked fingers at Sarah Palin’s ‘Target’ map.

It is time that the American people see through the spin, the lies and the chicanery perpetrated upon them by the Liberals and Progressives for political points and political gain. The left is not the solution, nor does it know the solution to all this nation’s ills, when it is the left that politicizes those ills for their own political gain. 

The left has no solution. The left creates the problem.

As a nation, we should demand better from those on the left, and we should also hold the right to a higher and a better standard than what we expect from the left. For the right to achieve such standards would be a standard the left is incapable of ever achieving.

I dedicate this article to all the peaceful Progressives and Liberals out there. You guys need to really wake up.